Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Localization Applying An Efficient
Neural Network Mapping
  • Li Li and Thomas Kunz
2
Localization
  • Location information is essential to identify, for example, where sensor readings originated from and to track events and targets
  • Location information has numerous other applications
    • support of context-based routing protocols
    • geographic routing protocols
    • location-aware services
    • enhanced security protection mechanisms
  • Many devices embedded in real-world artifacts, so GPS is not an option
  • Software-based solutions explored in WSN world
    • Often require many anchor nodes (nodes with known location) or iterations (or both) to achieve high accuracy
    • Ranging measurements helpful where available, but not always available or of sufficient accuracy to be useful
3
Formulate the Problem
  • Given a distance matrix D, find the coordinates of all the points to achieve


4
Basics of Localization
  • A – Hyperbolic trilateration
  • B - Triangulation
  • C – Multilateration
  • Range-based vs. range-free localization methods
5
Cooperative Localization
  • Iterative trilateration/triangulation: utilization of the distance/angle information between the node and the anchor nodes
    • Often requires high volume of anchor nodes
    • Iterations of messaging
  • Cooperative Localization: joint utilization of all connectivity/distance information among all nodes
    • Require minimum anchor nodes or anchor free
    • High level of accuracy
    • Computationally intensive
6
Cooperative Localization State-of-Art
  • Solution techniques: non-linear mapping, least square estimation, multi-dimensional scaling (MDS)







  • Rigidity theory (mass-spring model, minimize energy)
    • NP hard
    • Heuristic algorithms
  • Model inter-node distances as convex constraints
    • Use linear programming/semi-definate programming to estimate location
7
Curvilinear Component Analysis
  • Nonlinear mapping technique developed for self-organizing neural network
  • Characteristics
    • More efficient compared to other non-linear mapping algorithms: MDS-O(M3), Sammon’s mapping -O(M2N),CCA-O(M2)
    • Precise distance cost function to reduce high dimensional data with high accuracy
    • Far less problem of local minima
      • MDS: computationally intensive post-processing step
    • Self-learning capability for adding new nodes
      • Not yet explored further in our work though
8
CCA Algorithm
  • Given a data set I of dimension M, CCA projects I to data set O of dimension S where S<M and preserves in the output set O the distances between all the data points in I


9
Localize Nodes Using CCA
  • Input data set: distance matrix
  • Distance of the input data vectors: distance matrix (connectivity or measurement-based)
  • Output dimension: 2D or 3D
  • Output data set: node coordinates
  • Initial values for y: derived from x



10
Centralized CCA Solution: extremely good performance
11
Issues & Solutions
  • Distance Matrix for large networks is impossible to be obtained
    • Local matrix, local maps and map patching solutions
    • Hop counts as distance approximations
    • Distance matrix reconstruction using incomplete distance information
  • Experimented with the local map approach


12
Distributed Map Algorithm
  • Every node collects distance matrix for nodes in its vicinity
    • 1 hop or 2 hop (larger neighborhood not always better)
  • Every node computes its local map (relative position)
  • If needed, local maps can be patched to a bigger map or global map
  • In any map, given three anchor nodes that have their coordinates known, the map is translated into the absolute positions.
13
Relative Map & After Transformation
  • Need a minimum of 3 (or 4) anchors for the 2D (or 3D) space to transfer a relative map to an absolute map
14
Results: Network Topologies
15
Results on Random Topologies
16
Results: Random Topologies
17
Conclusions and Future Work
  • For all network topologies, CCA-Map can achieve good localization results (below 10%r) for low connectivity levels when using ranging
  • Using connectivity only, CCA-Map achieves 20%r or better for reasonably low connectivity levels
  • CCA-Map almost always significantly better than MDS-Map
  • CCA-Map does not require many anchor nodes
  • Future Work
    • Study irregular and anisotropic networks in more detail (Milcom paper)
    • Improve stability of MDS and CCA in range-free case
    • Implement algorithm in testbed to study computational complexity
      • May exploit hierarchical nature of testbed to run localization on only clusterheads