|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
   
    | w | Mobility
    Metrics: 
 |  | 
   
    |  | 
   
    |  | n | parameters
    that represent current mobility status a node can monitor 
 |  | 
   
    |  | 
   
    |  | n | Proposed:
    no. of link breaks,
    relative mobility, link duration etc. 
 |  | 
   
    |  | 
   
    |  | n | Selection
    rule: simple, certain accuracy, not require extra equipment, 
 | 
   
    |  | impact
    on routing protocol performance (here, PDR) 
 |  | 
   
    |  | 
   
    | w | Simulation
    Environment: 
 |  | 
   
    |  | 
   
    |  | n | NS2,
    80 (170 for MH ) nodes in 1000x1000 m area, time: 900s 
 |  | 
   
    |  | 
   
    |  | n | Mobility
    models: RWP, MH and RPGM 
 |  | 
   
    |  | 
   
    |  | l | Aside:
    RWP, RPGM match well empirically observed human mobility 
 |  | 
   
    |  | 
   
    |  | n | Traffic:
    CBR, 25 sources, 4 packets/s with 64 bytes size/packet 
 |  | 
   
    |  | 
   
    |  | n | Routing
    protocols: AODV, DSR and OLSR 
 |  |