|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• |
Without
TPS or ARS, the delay of two voice calls from the NOC
|
|
|
were
both 1.4 +/- 0.3 seconds at high load, far less than an
|
|
|
generally
accepted maximum of 500 ms.
|
|
|
• |
In
order to improve utilization of the network, an MPLS overlay
|
|
|
was
introduced to allow traffic travelling to Ship 4 to take
|
|
|
different
routes depending on the application type and priority.
|
|
|
|
• |
In
this case high priority voice traffic was to travel via Ship 3 while
|
|
|
all
other traffic will travel over the default route via Ship 1.
|
|
|
• |
With
the combination of TPS and ARS, the impact on the delay of
|
|
voice
packets is significant.
|
|
|
|
• |
The
high-priority voice call which is taking the alternate lightly
|
|
|
loaded
route via Ship 3 has a delay of 0.19 +/- 0.03 seconds while the
|
|
|
lower
priority voice call which uses the default route has a delay of
|
|
|
0.43
+/- 0.10 seconds.
|
|