 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
q |
The
overall gain when using the proposed model
|
|
|
depends highly on the various components used in the
|
|
|
model.
The model has been tested over DiffServ,
|
|
|
INSIGNIA,
SWAN and ESWAN.
|
|
|
q |
The
performance of the ad-hoc QoS implementation
|
|
|
has high impact on the overall performance due to the
|
|
|
limited
resources available on ad-hoc domains.
|
|
|
q |
The
use of reactive resource allocation avoids the
|
|
|
trouble of provisioning services, but adds a little latency
|
|
to
service initiation.
|
|
|
q |
The proposed model shows significant enhancement to
|
|
|
supported RT traffic BW & delay associated with limited
|
|
|
impact
on BE traffic when employing SWAN.
|
|