1
|
- Yasser Gadallah
- Thomas Kunz
- June 20, 2006
|
2
|
- Protocol Objectives and Overview
- Performance and Scalability Evaluation
- Comparison with On-demand Power Management
- Conclusions
|
3
|
- Complementing the functionality of existing MANET routing protocols from
energy-efficiency perspective
- Introducing fair low impact energy conservation to network operation
- Achieving robust operation that is independent of the functionality of
the routing protocol
|
4
|
- “Protocol Independent Energy Saving”, PIES
- Achieves fair energy conservation by:
- Putting nodes to sleep for equal time periods.
- Providing the routing algorithm with energy threshold info to help it
make fair energy conscious decisions
- Fully distributed algorithm – functionality does not depend on a node or
a set of nodes
- Modular nature – easily integrated with existing routing algorithms
- Deterministic sleep pattern enables nodes to determine mathematically
neighbors’ sleep state
- Configurable in such a way that introduces no additional traffic to the
network
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
7
|
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
10
|
- Energy is the most scarce resource for the functionality of mobile ad
hoc networks
- PIES is a solution that achieves fair energy conservation and works with
MANET routing algorithms of all categories
- Simulations show that PIES scales well with increased network population
and traffic
- Comparison with on-demand power management showed that PIES has superior
energy, network lifetime and data delivery performance
|