 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| n |
Broadcast
protocols work well. BCAST and FLOOD are
|
|
|
almost
always as good as or better than other protocols,
|
|
|
though
sometimes impose higher packet latency.
|
|
| n |
Protocol
overhead lower/competitive with best multicast
|
|
|
protocol
|
|
| n |
For a
single multicast sender, FLOOD is the obvious
|
|
|
choice,
for increasing number of multicast senders BCAST
|
|
has
the edge over FLOOD
|
|
| n |
ADMR
performs very well in the presence of many
|
|
|
multicast
senders, (is optimal choice in two scenarios
|
|
|
under
low mobility), with BCAST being runner-up. All
|
|
|
other
protocols perform poorly in these scenarios.
|
|
| n |
The
choice of an optimal multicasting solution is largely
|
|
|
independent
of the mobility rate.
|
|
