 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| , |
Improved
OLSR performance, in particular in more mobile scenarios
|
| , |
Idea
of an adaptive protocol (nodes individually adjust their routing
|
|
|
|
protocol
behavior) has promise
|
|
| , |
Future
Work (in increasing order of difficulty, no student right now
|
|
|
to do
any of it
. )
|
|
|
|
Need
more experimental validation
|
|
|
, |
Different
mobility models, in particular group mobility models
|
|
|
|
, |
Different
levels/type of offered load
|
|
|
|
Consider
further changes to OLSR
|
|
|
, |
TC
Interval, MPR Selection, etc.
|
|
|
|
Apply
these insights/ideas to other routing protocols
|
|
|
|
|
Consider
additional avenues for adaptive behavior
|
|
|
, |
A
node that is currently routing multiple flows may find it beneficial to
spend
|
|
|
more
efforts in routing that a node that is currently not used
|
|