 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| l |
Lots
of work on ROUTING PROTOCOLS, though very
|
|
little
on avoiding packet loss due to route failure
|
|
|
|
u |
Flow
Oriented Routing Protocol (FORP): destination predicts
|
|
|
topology
change based on the Link Expiration Time
|
|
|
|
u |
Associativity
Based Routing (ABR), Signal Stability-Based
|
|
|
Adaptive
Routing (SSA) favor longer-live routes
|
|
|
| l |
Paper
in MobiCom 2001
|
|
|
|
u |
Also
uses signal power strength
|
|
|
|
u |
Goal:
reduce packet latency
|
|
|
|
u |
Different
approach: preemptive zone, based on threshold
|
|
|
|
u |
At
least 2 times increase in routing protocol overhead for DSR
|
|
