1
|
|
2
|
- Introduction and Motivation
- Problem Definition & Major Challenges
- Design Fundamentals
- Proposed Model Architecture
- Proposed Model Performance and Behavioral Characteristics
- Summery of Simulation Results and Conclusion
- Publications Resulted from this Research
|
3
|
- The increasing availability of WLAN.
- The enormous growth of cellular networks.
- The development of Community Access Networks.
- The growing popularity of P2P wireless applications.
- The increasing interest in ad-hoc and MESH networks.
- All of the above market growth fuel the need to develop a QoS access
gateways that can provide better than BE services to roaming nodes with
minimum configuration.
|
4
|
- MAC QoS
- DCF, EDCF, WLAN implementations
- QoS-aware routing
- Inter-layer QoS models
- dQoS, FQMM,
INSIGNIA, SWAN
- QoS-aware Applications
- Other approaches
- CROSS-DOMAIN view:
IntServ over DiffServ
|
5
|
- The merging of different QoS model employed on each side of the gateway.
- The lack of a policing authority in the ad-hoc domain leads to the need
for extra policing on the gateway that may not be scalable.
- The difficulty in maintaining accounting and billing records for the
mobile nodes due to the lack of a central authority.
- The difficulty in obtaining effective service provisioning leaves the
gateway with a hard optimization decisions.
- Designing scalable architecture.
|
6
|
|
7
|
- The Reuse of Common Gateway Design Principals
- Common Service Subset, Asymmetric Design
- Access Network as a Private Friendly DiffServ Domain
- Reactive Aggregated
Resource Allocation
- Services are requested
only when needed
- The Use of Limited Policing
- Compromise between
scalability and policing
- Service Ladder Policy (Optional)
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
10
|
|
11
|
|
12
|
|
13
|
- Enabling proposed model increases the amount of bandwidth assigned to
RT-flows. In association, the BE-bandwidth experience limited change.
- Enabling proposed model decreases the average RT-delays by a large
margin, while the average BE-delays experience limited change.
- Enabling proposed model results in smoother bandwidth and delay charts
which facilitates smaller jitter.
|
14
|
- The overall gain when using the proposed model depends highly on the
various components used in the model. The model has been tested over
DiffServ, INSIGNIA, SWAN and ESWAN.
- The performance of the ad-hoc QoS implementation has high impact on the
overall performance due to the limited resources available on ad-hoc
domains.
- The use of reactive resource allocation avoids the trouble of
provisioning services, but adds a little latency to service initiation.
- The proposed model shows significant enhancement to supported RT traffic
BW & delay associated with limited impact on BE traffic when
employing SWAN.
|
15
|
- Yasser L. Morgan and Thomas Kunz, “A Proposal for an Ad-hoc Network QoS
Gateway”, to appear in the
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile
Computing, Networking and Communications WiMob-05, Montreal Canada,
August 2005.
- Yasser L. Morgan and Thomas Kunz, “A Design Framework for Wireless MANET
QoS Gateway”, to appear in the
Proceedings of the 6th ACIS International Conference on Software
Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and
Parallel/Distributed Computing, pp. 31-37, Towson USA, May 2005.
- Yasser L. Morgan and Thomas Kunz, “Enhancing SWAN QoS Model By Adopting
Destination-Based Regulation (ESWAN)”, in the Proceedings of the 2nd
WiOpt-04 Conference for Modeling and Optimization in Mobile Ad-hoc and
Wireless Networks, pp. 112-121, Cambridge UK, March 2004.
- Yasser L. Morgan and Thomas Kunz, "PYLON: An architectural
framework for ad-hoc QoS interconnectivity with access domains", in
the Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on System Sciences,
Hawaii USA, January 2003.
- Yasser L. Morgan and Thomas Kunz, “An Architectural Framework for MANET
QoS Interaction with Access Domains”, Proceedings of the 1st
International Conference on Ad-Hoc and Wireless Networks, pp 33-47,
Toronto Ontario-Canada, September 2002.
|
16
|
|