 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| n |
Broadcast
protocols work well. BCAST and FLOOD are almost
|
|
|
always
as good as or better than other protocols, though sometimes
|
|
|
impose
higher packet latency.
|
|
|
| n |
Protocol
overhead lower/competitive with best multicast protocol
|
|
|
| n |
For a
single multicast sender, FLOOD is the obvious choice, for
|
|
|
increasing
number of multicast senders BCAST has the edge over
|
|
|
FLOOD
|
|
|
| n |
ADMR
performs very well in the presence of many multicast senders,
|
|
|
(is
optimal choice in two scenarios under low mobility), with BCAST
|
|
|
being
runner-up. All other protocols perform poorly in these scenarios.
|
|
| n |
The
choice of an optimal multicasting solution is largely independent
|
|
|
of
the mobility rate.
|
|
