1
|
- Presents:
- Pedro Villanueva
- eduardov79@yahoo.com
|
2
|
- Presentation
- OLSR – Technical Description
- Research Target
|
3
|
|
4
|
- System for exchanging information (e.g. messages) among two or more
hosts.
- The information is passed over a single or multiple links.
|
5
|
- Wireless hosts (mainly standard 802.11)
- Communication without a fixed infrastructure
- Nodes behave as hosts and as routers
- The hosts are mainly assumed to be mobile
- Self-configuring network
- Medium range
|
6
|
- Nodes inside the transmission radius of any node “S” are considered
neighbors (1 hop away distance)
- The communication with no-neighbors is achieved in multi-hop fashion
|
7
|
- Soldiers on the battlefield
- Laptop networks in conference room
- Emergency disaster relief networks
|
8
|
- Mechanism for finding paths from source host to destination host.
- Routing Protocol: Facilitates the exchange of information to support
routing between networks.
- Routing information is stored in “routing tables” by the routers.
|
9
|
- Protocols use different metrics to find network paths.
- Hop count, bandwidth, delay, path cost, load, link quality (wireless).
- Routing Technologies
- Flooding (the simplest)
- Distance-vector routing (e.g RIP )
- Links-state routing (e.g OSPF )
|
10
|
- Interior Gateway Protocols
- Exchange the routing information inside a single autonomous system (e.g.
RIP, OSPF, IGRP, EIGRP, IS-IS)
- Exterior Gateway Protocols
- Exchange the routing information between separate autonomous systems (e.g.
EGP, BGP)
|
11
|
- The routers exchange their routing tables. They say: “For me the network
looks like…”
|
12
|
- Advantages
- Simple and efficient for small networks
- The required management is minimum
- Routing tables are sent only to neighboring nodes
- Disadvantages
- Not scalable!!!
- Poor convergence properties
- The exchanged routing tables might be very large
|
13
|
- The routers flood, the availability of links to their neighbors. They
say: “My neighbors are…”
|
14
|
- Advantages
- React quickly and in a bounded amount of time to topology changes (Faster
convergence)
- Exchanged information is small
- More scalable than Distance-Vector
- Disadvantages
- Requires larger storage and CPU power to maintain the network map (more
expensive to support)
- Exchanged information is flooded into the network
|
15
|
- OSPF (Open Shortest Path First)
- Link State, Interior Gateway Protocol
- Dijkstra’s algorithm is used to calculate the shortest path to any
destination from a source “S”
- Link state database is constructed at each router
- Link cost is the routing metric
|
16
|
- OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing Protocol)
- Optimizes the link state flooding mechanism
- Multipoint Relay (MPR) nodes achieve the optimization
- A set of MPR nodes is chosen by each node in the network
- The node’s view of the topology becomes partial
- Proactive Protocol (Routes immediately available)
|
17
|
- MPR nodes are chosen in such a way that every 2-Hop neighbor can be
reached by the MPRs
|
18
|
- OLSR – Technical Description
|
19
|
- OLSR Host
- OLSR Interfaces (Each one with unique IP)
- None (It may be injected to the OLSR routing domain)
- Single
- Multiple
- Main address and Secondary addresses
- Main Address
- Node identifier
- IP address of any interface
|
20
|
- Nodes
- Neighbor
- 2-Hop neighbor
- Strict 2-Hop neighbor
- Multipoint relay (MPR)
- Multipoint relay selector (MPRS)
|
21
|
- Link Type
- Link Status
- Down
- Up
- Good quality
- Medium quality
- Poor quality
|
22
|
- Data Packets
- Transmit user’s information from a source to a destination
- The information is referred as the “payload” of the packet
- Control Packets
- Transmit protocol supporting data
- Mostly transmitted before Data Packets
- From next slide onwards referred as “Packets” only
|
23
|
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
-
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Packet Length | Packet Sequence Number |
-
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Message Type | Vtime | Message Size |
-
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Originator
Address |
-
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Time To Live | Hop Count |
Message Sequence Number
|
-
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |
|
- : MESSAGE :
- |
|
-
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | Message Type | Vtime | Message Size |
-
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- (etc.)
- OLSR Packet Format
|
24
|
|
25
|
- Transmitted packets are temporally stored
- Forwarding is performed on all interfaces by the MPR nodes
- Unknown messages are forwarded once by the so called Default Forwarding
Algorithm
- If required some messages can bypass the MPRs
- Nodes add jitters to avoid messages collisions
- Jitter = random delay before retransmitting
|
26
|
- Duplicate Set
- Interface Association Set (interface - main address)
- Link set (symmetric, asymmetric or lost)
- Neighbors (symmetric, not_symmetric and willingness)
- Neighbor set
- 2-hop Neighbor set
- MPR
- Topology set (Destination and previous hop)
|
27
|
- OLSR interfaces are linked to main address
- Each node announces its multiple interfaces
- Multiple Interfaces Declaration (MID) messages
- MID messages are flooded by MPRs (TTL=255)
- Only Link Sensing uses this information
|
28
|
- Generated per each node on each interface
- Advertises the entire 1-hop neighbourhood
- Willingness to carry and forward traffic (MPR)
|
29
|
- Based on local link set, neighbour set, MPR set
- Support link sensing, neighbour detection and MPR signalling
- Link Types:
- Unspecified, Asymmetric, Symmetric, Lost
- Neighbour Types:
- Symmetric, MPR, Not Neighbour
|
30
|
- Populates the Link Set
- Based on the exchange of Hello messages
- Detects links with neighbors
- Each link can be symmetric or asymmetric
|
31
|
- Populates the Neighbor Set
- Based on status and changes of the Link set
- Populates the 2-hops neighbor set
- Populates the MPR set
- Populates the MPR selector set
|
32
|
- MPRs optimize the classical flooding mechanism
- Each node selects its own MPRs from its 1-hop symmetric neighbours
- Through the MPRs all symmetric strict 2-hop neighbours must be reached
- Recalculated when symmetric neighbourhoods change (1-hop or strict
2-hop)
|
33
|
- MPRs are signalled as MPR neighbour type, inside Hello messages
- MPR Selector (MPRS) set is populated when any node is signalled as a MPR
neighbour
- MPRs are computed per interface.
- MPR candidate nodes must have willingness different from Will_Never
|
34
|
- MPR set = Ř
- MPR += 1-hop neighbors with willingness=Will_always
- MPR += 1-hop neighbors that are the only ones reaching a 2-hops neighbor
- Remove the 2-hop neighbors reached by the MPRs
- Add 1-hop nodes (to the MPR set) providing maximum reachability of 2-hop
neighbors UNTIL reaching all 2-hop neighbors.
|
35
|
- Information dissemination to construct routes
- Broadcast by MPRs only
- Links between an MPR and its selector set (Advertised Neighbor set) are
the minimum information that must be broadcast
|
36
|
- The disseminated topology view is partial
- The ANSN (Advertised Neighbor Sequence Number) keeps track of the most
recent information.
- The topology information supports the routing table calculation
mechanism
|
37
|
- Each node maintains its own routing table
- Based on the Link and Topology sets.
- Recalculated (without transmitting any message) when a change is
detected in either:
- Link set
- Neighbor set
- 2-hop neighbor set
- Topology set
- Multiple interface association set.
|
38
|
- Calculated using a shortest path algorithm
- Assuming existence of:
|
39
|
- MANET nodes must be part of the same subnet
- Additional networks connected to the MANET must be part of distinct
subnets
- MANET nodes connected to external networks must provide paths to them
- OLSR maintains the Routing Table but it DOES NOT perform packet
forwarding
|
40
|
- Interfaces connected to separate network
- External route information has to be injected into OLSR domain (MANET)
- It is injected by Gateway nodes broadcasting HNA (Host and Network
Association) messages
|
41
|
- Gateways broadcast external network address and network mask
- Information is stored in the Association Set
- HNA messages are similar to TC messages
|
42
|
|
43
|
- Relax MPR selection mechanism to satisfy multiple path-constraints
- Provide multiple paths to same destination for load balancing
- Extend the OLSR messages to distribute node and link specific
information
|
44
|
- Relax the partial view of the network topology to provide enough
constraint-compliant links
- Increase Routing Reliability
- Gradually and dynamically adjust the amount of topology information
exchanged while maintaining flooding optimality
|
45
|
- Multiple paths for any destination will be provided (when possible)
- Paths will be introduced in the routing table and will be ranked
according to their optimality
- OS kernel has to be modified to allow multiple paths for same
destination
|
46
|
- OS forwarding mechanism will make use of multiple paths when required
|
47
|
- The new messages will be designed by following the OLSR-RFC
specifications in order to make them compatible with any OLSR
implementation
- The information carried by the new messages will be provided by the Data
Collection group
|
48
|
- The node-specific information might include:
- Remaining battery
- Available buffer space
- The link-specific information might include:
- Bandwidth available
- Error rate
- Signal strength
|
49
|
- Presented by:
- Pedro Villanueva
- eduardov79@yahoo.com
|